Reviewing manuscripts for Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine.
نویسندگان
چکیده
The quality of journals rests, to a large degree, on the quality of the peer review process. Like nearly all scientific journals, the ARCHIVES relies on a volunteer pool of talented individualswhotake timeoutof their busyweektoreviewmanuscripts.The journalcouldnotbepublishedwithouttheirhelp, and we are extremely grateful for their efforts. However, reviewers are rarely given anyadvice,bytheirseniorcolleaguesoranyoneelse,onthebestwaytoconductreviews. Ourpurpose inthisbriefarticle is toprovide somesuggestions for reviewers so that their time can be spent producing a review that will be helpful to authors and editors.
منابع مشابه
Is human immunodeficiency virus sexual risk prevention intervention effective?
T HE DESIGN used in this study –quasiexperimental–is unfamiliar to clinical readers. There are few easily available worksheets or prescriptive methods for reviewing such an article. We used 2 excellent resources to generate questions used in the evaluation of this article, modified by 2 of us (M.H. and W.B.), and reordered here to match the sequence of the study. The graphic (Figure) helps to a...
متن کاملResponding to reviewers' comments on submitted articles.
The letter from the editor generally comes in one of 4 flavors. First, a manuscript may be accepted without any changes. If this happens to you, count yourself lucky; such an editorial response is rare. In our experience, this has happened only once for each of us. Second, the manuscript may be accepted with suggestions for minor revisions. Again, count your blessings, quickly make the suggeste...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine
دوره 156 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2002